Fukushima Could Be Worse — And It Will Be

April 25, 2011
By

Damaged Fukushima I Nuclear Power Plant

UPDATED – 30 APRIL with the confirmation of the senior Japanese advisor that all three reactors have melted down: Crossposted from ex-skf’s blog  with a H/T to Francisco Gonzalez.

http://ex-skf.blogspot.com/2011/04/fukushima-i-nuke-plant-japan-nuclear.html

F-Daiichi is releasing 154 teraBecquerels of radionuclide particulate matter a day.  Almost all of the reports repeat the statement that Fukushima has (so-far) released only about 10% of the radiation Chernobyl released.  No problem.  Well, they say, “It COULD have been worse.”

IT WILL BE!

I stated that Chernobyl was over.  It isn’t.  Over a thousand of the wild boar hunted in Germany in 2010 contained more than the legal limit of 600 becquerels of radiation and the direct effects will be with us for at least a hundred more years.   I also stated that  Fukushima hasn’t really begun… and it hasn’t.   Chernobyl released a huge radioactive cloud when it blew up.  Fukushima will exceed the Chernobyl release in a year no matter what else happens. It will easily exceed the fallout created by all 2000+ nuclear tests – which were stopped because enough tests make a nuclear war unnecessary.  Once you irradiate all the plants and all the animals and all the fish and all the people, dropping bombs is superfluous.

Those melting nuclear cores aren’t going away.  There are additional differences.  Chernobyl didn’t dump radioactive water into the world’s primary fishing waters.  Fukushima will have to dump highly radioactive water into the oceans for many years just to PREVENT a Chernobyl-type accident – Fukushima will be many times worse than Chernobyl and will continue for, possibly, hundreds of years.

I was also a bit cavalier with this comment: “I was asked yesterday how soon someone could go back to the area of Fukushima Daiichi, buy land, build a house and do a little farming and fishing.  “20,000 years”.  “No, really.”  Well…three hundred years after the last fission reaction stops.  And then another 15,000 to allow all the isotopes it cooked up to decay.  Yep.  20,000.” I want to keep this readable – so sometimes I take a bit of license in order to do that.  In fact, the used USED fuel rods that have been blowing out of Fukushima and the fuel core that blew out of Chernobyl are very dangerous and stay that way for a long time.   http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Activityofuranium233.jpg They aren’t being stored safely anywhere on earth and they probably never will be.  That can has been kicked down the road for fifty years.

However, The 20,000 year estimate came from the fact that there is a biological in addition to a nuclear half-life of radionuclides. That means that at Chernobyl, particles which were deposited may  stay radioactive for a million years, but through the passage of time, they are eventually buried or separated enough so that the immediate danger of encountering them decreases. For everyone who gonged me about that number, you are literally correct.  But the point I was trying to make was that it would be a longer time than recorded history  - not that it would be that exact number.  What would you rather read…something we can all understand, or something that only a very few people can?

‘Nuff said about that.

I have information from Yoichi ‘boots on the ground’ that smoke was emitting from Kashiwazaki last week after the MAG 7,1 EQ. which occurred off Honshu on 7 APR 2011.  I have further information that in addition to Fukushima Daiichi, the nuclear plants at Onagawa, Fukushima Daini, Tokai and now Kashiwazaki, were ALL damaged by the MAG 9.0 EQ of March 11 and are in shut-down status.

I saw something really interesting today.  I went to Google Earth ™ and flew over Onagawa.  The inlets north and south of the reactor and everywhere else I looked suffered enormous damage from the tsunami.  Everywhere.  But not even a stone was out of place at the Onagawa nuclear plant.  The date on the map was 11 March, 2011.  The pictures of the plant probably came from Digital Globe one minute before the tidal wave hit – but they may be from last year.  I’ll wager it doesn’t look like that today.  The ‘after’ pictures show the disaster everywhere except at the reactor.  The pictures of Fukushima are now accurate at first  glance. I looked at Fukushima Daini, only 11km south of Fukushima Daiichi.  The tsunami destroyed the entire coastline but somehow didn’t hit the reactor at all.  Which is impossible.  I ran out of time before I got to Tokai, but now you know where to look.  The attached report (below) is interesting.

TEPCO wanted to re-start the three reactors at Kashiwazaki (which were damaged in a 2007 earthquake and have been off ever since).  That is not an example of forward thinking – it is pure, naked desperation.

Their idea of restarting Fukushima Daiichi reactors #5 and #6 further supports desperation.  There are so many problems at SEVERAL of their nuclear plants that rolling blackouts are now the norm.  Every functional nuclear plant is being pushed to the limit and beyond in order to maintain a semblance of normality – but they are ALL in bad repair and are sitting ducks for the next mega-quake….or for ONE overworked plant manager to make a bad decision. Or simply overuse.  Not only in Japan.  In the US  as well.

As of March 23, neutron beams have been reported at least thirteen times at Fukushima Daiichi. The Japanese government states that these are not the result of criticality accidents and then go right on to state that limited fission may be occurring.

Do tell!  If a neutron beam is observed at Fukushima (or anywhere else on earth), it is from a fission excursion.  You can call it  ‘limited fission’, ‘not a criticality accident’, ‘bubbles in the bathtub’ or any other name you like but nuclear criticality is the only thing that produces a neutron beam.

They are almost certainly leaving the isle of denial by now and coming to the belated realization that they can’t stop it. Remember that 6 to 9 month plan for ‘repair’?  You won’t hear that anymore.  Do you remember the idea of constructing a huge, steel tank to hold radioactive water?  That probably won’t happen. They would simply fill it up and wait for the next earthquake to breach it. Huge, steel water tanks do not survive MAG 6.9 earthquakes.  But the water must keep flowing.  20 cubic meters of it an hour, or the genie wakes up.

Furthermore, it is now becoming more likely that a small Chernobyl-type explosion DID occur at Fukushima Daiichi reactor #3.  I have to write the name out instead of abbreviating because there also seem to be problems at :

Onagawa reactor #3
Fukushima Daini reactor #3
Tokai Reactor #3
Kashiwazaki reactor #3

The evacuation zones are not going to be reduced at all -  On April 23, while a school doctor was telling the kids that the radiation danger is over, the Japanese government was EXPANDING the evacuation zones.  I didn’t read the wording of that announcement yet but Jeff Rense’ source in Japan said “The wording on the upcoming evacuation sounds eerily like expectation of another larger blast/meltdown.”

Which is it?  We already know.  On March 12 when the fuel tubes ruptured and the fuel pellets began to fission and melt together, it no longer mattered whether ALL of them did or not. The ones which are fissioning will continue. The ones which haven’t YET are merely waiting for the water to be turned off.

Again: SOME amount of fissile material is fissioning and continues to fission.  It is in a steel can which is partially full of boiling water.  There is not enough water to cover the fuel rods and too much to risk putting more water in – the container was not designed to hold water and it may rupture from the weight. It is, in effect, a nuclear cauldron.  If they pump the boiling water out (and into the ocean), the core will probably explode.  If they don’t pump it out, the next earthquake will breach the can and spill boiling radioactive water all over… and THEN the core will explode.

They don’t know the status of the fuel core. They cannot get near it.  The heat and radioactivity melts robots and cameras.  The core is protected by a hardened concrete caisson (called a containment vessel) which surrounds the reactor itself and is designed to protect them from bombs and airplane strikes AND TO KEEP THIS VERY THING FROM HAPPENING – but it is now cracked – so the bad stuff can get out and nothing can get in except some water through secondary lines. And the core is generating deadly radiation.

MULTIPLY THAT FOUR OR FIVE OR SIX TIMES.  Welcome to Honshu.

About the only viable plan left is to run away, but there is nowhere to run.  Or invent a scenario in which all of the remaining fuel is vaporized at once. Nuke all the cores at once and burn off all the fissile material.  THEN you can compare it to Chernobyl.  Or just wait and hope the extinction event doesn’t happen in your lifetime – but it will.  People will start dying in a big way by 2020.  The ones still alive in 2034 won’t necessarily be the lucky ones.  [EDIT] The 2020-2034 extinction is going to be a result solely of this incident – I realize it looked like that was what I was saying.   This is what I was saying:  http://drtom.posterous.com/the-perfect-storm-updated-and-reposted-from-2 . I apologize for not having made that clear.

This appeared on the Jeff Rense website.

Dr. Tom is a retired scientist who is now farming on the Big Island of Hawaii. He blogs at https://www.facebook.com/tcburnett

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

| Print This Post Print This Post
  • Pingback: Opinion: Fukushima Update a Year On | Hawai`i News Daily

  • Pingback: Radiation Bulletin: Fukushima News: April 25th – May 1st 2011 | The Energy Net

  • Tom Burnett

    @ Mary in Seattle: Since I cannot respond to your email (the recipient is only accepting mail from specific email addresses), you need to stop sending me email.

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

    • Mary in Seattle

      Accomplished some days ago. ;)

      Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

      • Tom Burnett

        Well…the above email is dated May 1. By ‘some days ago’ you mean ‘yesterday’.

        Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  • http://rocketmail dhruv’s lover

    was it fukushima who was effected by natural disasters and nuclear blast???????????????????
    i know it’s a silly question! :P

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 0

    • Tom Burnett

      Fukushima was subjected to a MAG 9.0 earthquake and a tsunami which caused three reactors to enter varying stages of intermittent criticality. The explosion at Reactor 3 could have been a fission explosion.

      Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

      • Joe Bassett

        So Tom what is going to happen to the Pacific Ocean? They ruined the gulf and Atlantic. Have they ruined the Pacific? Tell if this makes sense? What if they know they could create a few eartquakes near certain active volcanoes and these volcanoes spewed their junk for a few months. Let’s say it happened right now it would mean no crops grown this season in the northern Hemisphere. This would mean billions would starve. Maybe they are trying to destroy the oceans so when the go into their mountain resorts there will be little to eat. They will cause all the animals in the woods to go extinct.

        Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

        • Tom Burnett

          Joe, I love ya like a brother, but I know the military component of HAARP and it isn’t earthquakes.

          No food in the Northern hemisphere or ANY hemisphere doesn’t require volcanoes. We are already there. We have run out of water.

          Those mountain resorts aren’t going to have any water or power either – or food.

          Let me give you some more news. Those same mountain resorts exist all over the world and they are ALL going to be screwed. It doesn’t matter how rich you are or whether you live on a tropical island and own an airline. If there is no fuel, there isn’t. If there is no one to repair your airplane or catch your food, money suddenly means nothing. If there aren’t a lot of people around to impress with your wealth, eating freeze-dried food and dying alone with a sack of gold isn’t that great a plan.

          Even the richest 1% need the rest of us or they are no longer the richest 1%. They are junkyard dogs looking for the next meal.

          I have a plan and it is to survive global warming and live until my use-by date. I can do it no matter what else happens. I can even do it if the Japanese let Fukushima get away from them…and they will.

          It will be a somewhat Spartan existence, but that’s what I have accustomed myself to – so it won’t hurt much.

          What will REALLY hurt is the loss of communications and the Internet so I can’t tell people “I told you so”.

          Like or Dislike: Thumb up 3 Thumb down 0

  • Pingback: Questions. | Thus knowledge flows like water

    • Tom Burnett

      And photos. http://cryptome.org/nppw-series.htm

      Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

    • Tom Burnett

      I know everyone has seen this after a month but I wonder how many people actually read it and comprehended it and then followed the links and did the math. http://www.glgroup.com/News/The-Real-Reason-for-the-Huge-Confusion-Over-Those-High–Dose-Readings–53325.html

      Probably none.

      I did, but I’m funny that way. I have alluded to the ‘hundreds’ of fissile products and their resultant or ‘daughter’ products – and I have stayed away from terms like binary and ternary fission. But the information is available in and easy-to-understand format (complete with drawings), here. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuclear_fission

      Everyone is welcome to challenge my knowledge of the fission process and observations and opinions. Do it. We all need someone to fact-check us. But be specific. Don’t challenge me with nonsense you cannot back up and don’t challenge me with this crap: “Dude! You are like just totally wrong, man.” Because if you do, I’ll think you are a dumbass.

      Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  • YW

    Hi Tom

    Thanks for your open, informative blog and human tone.
    I agree Fukushima already looks worse than even Chernobyl.
    Among our differences in nuance, you live nearer to Japan and are more downstream from this particular source, than here in Israel. But in half-life run of global contamination that makes no difference.

    When Chernobyl blew, the background monitors went up slightly here in Israel and our government tried to keep that secret from the public. Those winds blew mainly NW to Poland, Sweden, etc.

    Good work in your blog.

    I share with you some fan questions I just sent to Gundersen.

    ———- Forwarded message ———-
    Date: Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 12:03 PM
    Subject: breakdown of material in fuel pool explosion fuku #3

    to Arnie Gundersen, Chief Engineer contact@fairewinds.com

    some questions re 26.4 your video >” Unit 3 Explosion May Have Been Prompt Criticality in Fuel Pool”

    1) can you estimate the size of explosion on 13.Mar? Can this be rated on the nuclear weapon megaton scale? If so about how many ton?

    2) About what quantity or part of the spent fuel rods was volatized or was exploded?

    3) Out of the reported total quantity of fuel rods that were in the #3 pool, from the limited information available is it possible to estimate a breakdown of the resulting states of the material, or even just list and define possibilities?

    TABLE: reported total quantity of fuel rods in #3
    exploded, vaporized, volatized, pulverized broken into big chunks, portable macro pieces, floatable micro pieces and gas particles, etc? AND , how much left behind in the still hot pool….

    4) why 3 booms heard on the video http://boingboing.net/2011/03/13/explostion-at-fukush.html when only one flash is seen? the 2nd must be an echo but where is the 3rd from? Is this some acoustic feature of atomic bomb shock waves?

    5) How high in the sky was the particles blown. The camera is distant about a 2 second sound delay. So the distance to the reactor pool explosion can be estimated.

    6) Were nuclear explosions ever envisioned in possible power reactor failure? We were told that this is an impossibility.

    7) locally here in Israel also the whole events renew needs to study nuclear power/military issues and environment…

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 0

    • Tom Burnett

      Aloha and thank you for the kind words.

      Let us see how closely my answers match Arnie’s. If they differ, I stand by mine.

      1) can you estimate the size of explosion on 13.Mar? Can this be rated on the nuclear weapon megaton scale? If so about how many ton?

      It looked like a conventional explosion. Maybe equivalent to a 2,000 pound bomb – I believe two explosions occurred; the second inside the concrete reactor containment which blew the top o the containment off.

      2) About what quantity or part of the spent fuel rods was volatized or was exploded?

      There is no way to know. Spent fuel rods were tossed up to two miles away. Coin-toss odds say that half the material went missing.

      3) Out of the reported total quantity of fuel rods that were in the #3 pool, from the limited information available is it possible to estimate a breakdown of the resulting states of the material, or even just list and define possibilities?
      TABLE: reported total quantity of fuel rods in #3
      exploded, vaporized, volatized, pulverized broken into big chunks, portable macro pieces, floatable micro pieces and gas particles, etc? AND , how much left behind in the still hot pool….

      I will guess that most of the fuel rods are now broken open. Depending upon the vertical level of the initiation of the explosion it is reasonable to assume that material above that point was mostly ejected with the top of the containment and material below was compressed. Everything that was available to move probably moved.

      4) why 3 booms heard on the video http://boingboing.net/2011/03/13/explostion-at-fukush.html when only one flash is seen? the 2nd must be an echo but where is the 3rd from? Is this some acoustic feature of atomic bomb shock waves?

      It wasn’t an atomic bomb. I don’t know where the three sounds originated but it is clear that there were two, almost simultaneous explosions. The first was a hydrogen explosion, probably outside of the reactor containment and it likely shock-initiated another hydrogen explosion within the containment. It was a larger explosion because the containment held until the force of the explosion took the top off of it. This is similar to the firing of a bullet. The powder burns and increases pressure until the bullet is force-ably ejected from the shell. It is also possible that another chain of events occurred which resulted in the two explosions.

      5) How high in the sky was the particles blown. The camera is distant about a 2 second sound delay. So the distance to the reactor pool explosion can be estimated.

      That’s a difficult question. Particles the size of visible chunks of concrete and fuel pellets went hundreds of feet in order to land two miles away. There are ballistics formulas to determine the force necessary to propel a certain weight at an optimum (45 degree) angle to reach a certain distance. I don’t believe that is the question you are asking.

      6) Were nuclear explosions ever envisioned in possible power reactor failure? We were told that this is an impossibility.

      They were never envisioned. They are not happening. Fukushima is not a nuclear explosion. A nuclear detonation – a supercritical reaction – is difficult to achieve and is unlikely to be created by accident. However, a nuclear weapon is designed to do what a reactor does – just all at once. The results of a criticality excursion produce the same after-effects as a nuclear weapon. The ‘fallout’ products are basically the same.

      7) locally here in Israel also the whole events renew needs to study nuclear power/military issues and environment…

      Israel re-processes nuclear weapons core material at Dimona. It doesn’t have to make it’s own. The US has provided nuclear weapons and warheads which were ‘timing out’ to Israel. That is why Israel never had the problems Iran is having – although there is a functional mock-up of Iran’s enrichment facility at Dimona, including the control mechanistic and centrifuges. That’s where the research for the STUXNET worm was done.

      The Israeli nuclear weapons program is not, in itself, dangerous in situ – because someone has to make the conscious decision to push a button. In my opinion, GEN I and II BWR reactors in Japan and the US…and wherever GE sold them…are much more dangerous. They are not being well-maintained because the NRC is funded by the nuclear industry. They are accidents waiting to happen.

      Like or Dislike: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 0

  • DecentDiscourse

    I am not pro-nuclear power, however I am also not pro-propaganda or pro-sloppy reporting. This is at best a shameful, shallow excuse for journalism and at worst a sinister play on people’s fears.

    It’s precisely in a situation like this that newspapers have a vital role to play in GIVING PEOPLE FACTS and this little lump of coal masquerading as journalism does not meet the test.

    There are so very many fundamental things completely wrong about this that I would urge all of you who want to really know to check out the union of concerned scientists site ucsusa.org and deliverrelief.blogspot.com for at least a bit of real news and background.

    The above “article” gives new meaning to the term “hack job” and should be withdrawn. Really. I thought the pro-nuke guys were bad, but this just takes the cake.

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 2

    • Tom Burnett

      Really? What is factually inaccurate? Where, exactly, is the ‘propaganda’?

      If I tell people that it will get dark at night…does that play to their fear of the dark, or initiate a thought process which might enable them to light a candle?

      Did you read this? http://www.glgroup.com/News/TEPCO-Data-Shows-Ongoing-Criticalities-Inside-Leaking-Fukushima-Daiichi-Unit-2-53751.html

      How about this…did you look at it at all? http://www.tepco.co.jp/en/press/corp-com/release/11042811-e.html

      You insist on facts but don’t provide any. Every time I say something, the facts are there to back it up. If you have facts, step up.

      Like or Dislike: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 0

    • Dr. Tom

      I am so irked at this poster that I have to revisit the thread. The Union of Concerned Scientists says they have moved on from Fukushima – suggesting that the problem there is over. It isn’t. I even went to the ridiculous blog at deliverrelief.blogspot and read that we should be concentrating on ‘empowering the people of Japan’ in their recovery effort. No. The government of Japan should be empowering the people of Japan and they aren’t. Because they can’t.

      My job is to empower everyone else not to just curl up in a ball and give up. Fear isn’t dangerous. Making irrational decisions based upon fear of the unknown IS dangerous. I intend to make the unknown known so no one has to fear it – but that doesn’t mean pretending no danger exists. It means defining the potential danger so that we can define a logical and rational path to avoid it.

      If you want to build nuclear reactors, have at it – IF you can guarantee that when they melt down, the radiation they release stays in your country.

      Fukushima is affecting ME and I’m not in Japan. It is affecting the US mainland as well. You want to empower the people of Japan to do…what? Become immune to radiation?

      Listen, Jackass. I am ‘pro’nuke’ as long as it is overseen by someone competent. It isn’t – anywhere in the world. Continuing to burn fossil fuel is not an answer either and there is no ‘green’ energy capable of supplying the energy needs of the world. IS there an answer? Sure. Pretend it doesn’t exist. We will continue to use the cheapest, most profitable energy sources we have because we cannot afford to develop new ones: fossil fuels and nuclear energy. We have no choice anymore. We are off the cliff and it won’t hurt until we hit bottom.

      If someone wants to call my articles ‘hack jobs’, be specific – and provide what you believe is the correct information so everyone can verify it.

      Like or Dislike: Thumb up 3 Thumb down 0

      • http://barry-williams.com Barry from Saskatchewan

        I am humbled to admit that I did not know what an ad hominem attack was until a couple of years ago.

        Now I even have a couple of my own shills – they’re everywhere! 8-)

        Good on you Tom. Keep it up.

        Like or Dislike: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 0

        • Tom Burnett

          Barry! Was this your shill? Don’t make me come to Skatche…Sacktesc…

          …er… Don’t make me come up there!

          Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

          • http://barry-williams.com Barry from Saskatchewan

            Saskatchewan – hard to say, easy to draw.

            A Canadian province with a million friendly folks living over lots of not-so-friendly uranium.

            You should come and visit – I know we’d click right away…

            Like or Dislike: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 0

  • Pingback: No room for complacency about Japan’s nuclear reactors « nuclear-news

  • Tom Burnett

    @Dwight: It’s a video on YouTube.
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IKqXu-5jw60

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

    • quartz20

      I love this video, at least safety was somewhat relevant back then.

      Like or Dislike: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 0

    • Dwight Kondo

      DrT:

      Duck and cover?

      “Sundays, holidays, vacation time, we must be ready everyday -ALL THE TIME! –To do the RIGHT THING if the Atomic Bomb explodes!”

      That kind of advice probably had a lot of Boomers later taking up Pot.

      When I first saw Bert’s vid, it reminded me of Basic Training, which includes, as you know, CBR training (Chemical, Biological, Radioactive). We got some instructions on hiding in ditches or injecting ourselves with Antrapine in case of a nerve gas attack. Then we all got gassed and drilled to put on gasmasks. That was nasty and I thought then, if the CS gas is this bad I ain’t waiting around for the biological or radioactive stuff. So to make a war story short, I ended up in PSYOPS.

      I’ve been thinking about that line from Bert’s vid: “DOING THE RIGHT THING IF THE ATOMIC BOMB EXPLODES!”

      I figured that IF the atomic bomb explodes, that means that I had NOT been doing the ‘right thing’ to prevent it ever happening. So I became political. Very. But of course, to no avail, it seems.

      But I do know that the notion of the ‘survivability” of an atomic blast is a PSYOP’s trick.

      ‘Survivability’ means that we can twist our minds around the idea that nuclear war acceptable. Since Bert wouldn’t lie to kids hiding under wooden school desks, there was no need to be concerned or terrified. Yet both seem to be highly reasonable emotions to nurture when dealing with megatons in the hands of megalomaniacs.

      So as now in Fukushima and our coming to terms with the Meltdown: Over the decades, nuclear energy, working hand in hand with the nuclear arms industry, needed us to come to terms with the acceptability of nuclear power plants. Funny, all the recent media discussion of the actual dangers of a nuclear power plant catastophe never came up when these ‘slow motion atomic bombs’/nuclear power plants were being proposed, shoved down our throats, built and operated shabbily.

      …So when the Drill Sergeant gathered up the platoon during a smoke break, he summed up some of the things we had just learned in the CBR training. Panic, I guess, never helps anything no matter how bad things gets. So ‘Sarge’ was going to try and reassure us, I thought.

      Says the sergeant: “When the alert is sounded and you become aware that an atomic blast is imminent, my best instruction to you people is that you all assume The Position immediately!” He turned, seemingly as if the special instructions for surviving a nuclear war had been successfully passed on to the recruits.

      But in no time one GI gathered the courage to ask the sergeant what was ‘The Position’.

      The sergeant turned as if fully expecting the inquiry and stood with his legs shoulder width apart and hands on his hips like Superman does and said confidently:

      “When you are alerted to the fact that an atomic bomb is about to be detonated anywhere in your vicinity, you are to immediately remove your helmet spread your feet at shoulder width, as like I do now, and then bend over, putting your head between your knees.

      At that time, I advise you all to then gently – KISS YOUR ASSES GOOD-BYE.”

      Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 5 Thumb down 0

  • yohanan

    Correction:
    1) Chernobyl is NOT over. The concrete sarcophagus is cracking. A larger containment is needed. In what century will Chernobyl’s nuclear fire be put out or eventually die out? Its widely dispersed radioactive materials with long half-lives are still around, decaying, radiating…
    2) Although Fukushima reportedly has the potential to be worse than Chernobyl, it’s not yet clear if it will get that bad.

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 2 Thumb down 0

    • Tom Burnett

      Let me correct any misunderstanding. No, Chernobyl IS NOT OVER. It won’t be over for centuries. If I said that I meant that the bleeding has stopped for the most part – that is to say that no fissile excursions have been reported lately – but that doesn’t mean anything. But since you agree with that, what prompts you to think Fukushima will not be as bad – especially since it already is?

      Agreed. The new sarcophagus for Chernobyl will not stop the radiation. We hope it will contain most of it, but if it were not necessary it wouldn’t be under consideration.

      Fukushima Daiichi will easily exceed Chernobyl as a precursor to an extinction event. Whether or not it is clear yet, or is being reported correctly, is beside the point. In fact, the possibility exists, in theory at least, that Russia will not spend the money on the new sarcophagus and will blame any atmospheric radiation on Japan. I hesitate to specify Fukushima Daiichi because I believe there are other problems at other nuclear plants which are not being reported.

      This is being hyped as a done deal. It isn’t.

      Like or Dislike: Thumb up 2 Thumb down 0

      • Chris

        Hi Tom,
        Thanks for all your work here,you are responding as passionately as I feel about what is happening in Fukushima.

        I live in Australia and NO ONE is talking about it here. My husband thinks I am obsessive and a bit paranoid actually.

        It all seems as business a usual.

        Now I’m no scientist but even I can see that we have a almost unimaginable disaster looming.

        What is ahead for my children? In fact I cry for all the animals and children that will suffer,not the adults for are we not all responsible for going along with the status quo?

        I beseech everyone in the coming times to help each other be they friend,family or complete stranger.

        For whatever we salvage at the end of a gun will be in the same mind-set that created the problem in the first place.

        We need to look to the Native Indigenous People’s of the world to learn how to live co-operately with the world and each other.

        Whatever happens, is this not a wake-up call to us all to change how we live before it is too late?

        Like or Dislike: Thumb up 3 Thumb down 0

        • Tom Burnett

          G’day, mate.

          I have a very good friend in Australia. She called me today and talked for about an hour. There IS a disaster looming – but how large and who may be involved can only be determined by measurements. Sadly, both the governments of Japan and the US seem to be hiding the data.

          Pardon me for disagreeing with part of your post, but societies are not salvaged at the end of a gun. Freedom is. Liberty is. And not without cause. People do not aggregate in large groups to engage in rapine and murder without a motive for gain. The indigenous native people do not live in peace and harmony and never have. The strong survive and conquer – not because it’s right, but because they can. And that is exactly the reason I’m not in Australia today. I don’t believe that any government in the world has the best interests of it’s citizenry as a primary priority. So when they begin to disarm the public, they are merely disabling the public from dissent.

          I am sure you won’t agree with that, but Switzerland has one of the lowest crime rates in the world yet every able-bodied male of military age is required to keep an automatic weapon at hand. Gun control isn’t about guns. It is about control. No firearms are allowed in Japan so the people are sheep. They do what they are told.

          Let us detach nuclear power and greed from firearms and the natural law which requires every person to ultimately be responsible for his or her own safety and then we can continue the discussion. For instance, I intend to feed and house as many people as may need to be fed and housed during the coming years. But I also understand that in doing that it is my responsibility to protect them, insofar as possible, from predators. If the economies of the world go bad, the governments’ ability to protect individuals will evaporate. Predators will rule until people adapt back to self-sufficiency and mutual protection.

          Your kids will be fine. No worries.

          Think of me the next time you fry up some Barramundi. Best fish in the world, innit.

          a hui hou
          T

          Like or Dislike: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 0

      • allmymarbles

        Thank you for this article. Heretofore I have been following events through Christopher Busby and Arnie Gundersen, two other sane and knowledgeable voices. I wonder if ultimately any of Japan will be habitable. And surely Hawaii and the mainland will have its share of woes. I am very old and fortunately will not live to see the worst of it, but my unfortunate children, grandchildren and great grandchildren will.

        Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  • EducationisKey

    Can you say agenda? Stating a small handful of facts and filling the rest with conjecture, speculation, fear-mongering and distortions of facts doesn’t help the situation. Do some real investigating. Take some classes. Educate yourself. Then, report back later when you actually know something about nuclear fission and the ‘daughter products’ of nuclear disasters.

    Hot debate. What do you think? Thumb up 5 Thumb down 7

    • Tom Burnett

      Oh. Ann Coulter. I was wondering when you would arrive. What ‘agenda’ might I have by stating facts? I have stated several times that I am pro-nuclear power and I’m not selling anything. I am pro-nuclear because the only other viable choice is pro-fossil-fuel. You see an agenda. What is it?

      You accuse ‘conjecture, speculation, fear-mongering and distortions of facts’. WHAT ARE THEY? You would be more convincing if you described and corrected them, with references, so we could all see what was actually being distorted. I was subjected to this very type of attack when I originally posted “When the Fukushima meltdown hits groundwater”. I said, in March, that Fukushima was a lever 7 incident. I was called an uneducated fear-monger. I had an agenda. It wasn’t that bad. Yada yada. Guess what?

      If you want to find agendas, find out why there are no post-tsunami aerial photos (or any photos) of the other nuclear plants I referenced. Find out why the US and Japanese governments rushed to increase the ‘safe’ radiation doses to sometimes an order of magnitude above the previous ‘safe’ radiation doses.

      Step up. Show me the distortions. Describe which of the 100+ radiogenic nuclides – which you call ‘daughter products’ and which have not reached a stable state aren’t important radiologically. Here: this might help you show me up: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radioactive_decay

      Fear-mongering. Really. Show me.

      Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 6 Thumb down 1

  • Tom Burnett

    “Will all the water in the Pacific Ocean be enough to cool down the heating in No 4 fuel rod storage tank?”

    They need fresh water. There probably isn’t enough in Honshu to feed both the population and the reactor for the next couple hundred years.

    “And what are we/they supposed to do if the water breaks down into its basic two elements, hydrogen and oxygen, and explodes like we seen three or four times already at Fukushima?”

    Read the thread “When the Fukushima meltdown hits ground water“. And kick back with some music. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fhcflDSUMvc

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 1

    • Tom Burnett

      ANOTHER person just accused me of having an ‘agenda’ (they didn’t specify) and of ‘distortions and fear-mongering’. I no sooner replied than the thread disappeared because they had been ‘gonged’ by low ratings (I rated it ‘like’).

      Before the next fool steps up, please read this: http://www.counterpunch.org/takashi04252011.html

      On the Danger of a Killer Earthquake in the Japanese Archipelago

      The Nuclear Disaster That Could Destroy Japan … and the World

      By HIROSE TAKASHI

      Translated by Doug Lummis

      The nuclear power plants in Japan are ageing rapidly; like cyborgs, they are barely kept in operation by a continuous replacement of parts. And now that Japan has entered a period of earthquake activity and a major accident could happen at any time, the people live in constant state of anxiety.

      Seismologists and geologists agree that, after some fifty years of seismic inactivity, with the 1995 Hanshin-Awaji Earthquake (Southern Hyogo Prefecture Earthquake), the country has entered a period of seismic activity. In 2004, the Chuetsu Earthquake hit Niigata Prefecture, doing damage to the village of Yamakoshi. Three years later, in 2007, the Chuetsu Offshore Earthquake severely damaged the nuclear reactors at Kashiwazaki-Kariwa. In 2008, there was an earthquake in Iwate and Miyagi Prefectures, causing a whole mountain to disappear completely. Then in 2009 the Hamaoka nuclear plant was put in a state of emergency by the Suruga Bay Earthquake. And now, in 2011, we have the 3/11 earthquake offshore from the northeast coast. But the period of seismic activity is expected to continue for decades. From the perspective of seismology, a space of 10 or 15 years is but a moment in time.

      Because the Pacific Plate, the largest of the plates that envelop the earth, is in motion, I had predicted that there would be major earthquakes all over the world.

      And as I had feared, after the Suruga Bay Earthquake of August 2009 came as a triple shock, it was followed in September and October by earthquakes off Samoa, Sumatra, and Vanuatu, of magnitudes between 7.6 and 8.2. That means three to eleven times the force of the Southern Hyogo Prefecture Earthquake.

      nuke map

      All of these quakes occurred around the Pacific Plate as the center, and each was located at the boundary of either that plate or a plate under its influence. Then in the following year, 2010, in January there came the Haiti Earthquake, at the boundary of the Caribbean Plate, pushed by the Pacific and Coco Plates, then in February the huge 8.8 magnitude earthquake offshore from Chile. I was praying that this world scale series of earthquakes would come to an end, but the movement of the Pacific Plate shows no sign of stopping, and led in 2011 to the 3/11 Earthquake in northeastern Japan and the subsequent meltdown at the Fukushima

      There are large seismic faults, capable of producing earthquakes at the 7 or 8 magnitude level, near each of Japan’s nuclear plants, including the reprocessing plant at Rokkasho. It is hard to believe that there is any nuclear plant that would not be damaged by a magnitude 8 earthquake.

      A representative case is the Rokkasho Reprocessing Plant itself, where it has become clear that the fault under the sea nearby also extends inland. The Rokkasho plant, where the nuclear waste (death ash) from all the nuclear plants in Japan is collected, is located on land under which the Pacific Plate and the North American Plate meet. That is, the plate that is the greatest danger to the Rokkasho plant, is now in motion deep beneath Japan.

      The Rokkasho plant was originally built with the very low earthquake resistance factor of 375 gals. (Translator’s note: The gal, or galileo, is a unit used to measure peak ground acceleration during earthquakes. Unlike the scales measuring an earthquake’s general intensity, it measures actual ground motion in particular locations.) Today its resistance factor has been raised to only 450 gals, despite the fact that recently in Japan earthquakes registering over 2000 gals have been occurring one after another. Worse, the Shimokita Peninsula is an extremely fragile geologic formation that was at the bottom of the sea as recently as the sea rise of the Jomon period (the Flandrian Transgression) 5000 years ago; if an earthquake occurred there it could be completely destroyed.

      The Rokkasho Reprocessing Plant is where expended nuclear fuel from all of Japan’s nuclear power plants is collected, and then reprocessed so as to separate out the plutonium, the uranium, and the remaining highly radioactive liquid waste. In short, it is the most dangerous factory in the world.

      At the Rokkasho plant, 240 cubic meters of radioactive liquid waste are now stored. A failure to take care of this properly could lead to a nuclear catastrophe surpassing the meltdown of a reactor. This liquid waste continuously generates heat, and must be constantly cooled. But if an earthquake were to damage the cooling pipes or cut off the electricity, the liquid would begin to boil. According to an analysis prepared by the German nuclear industry, an explosion of this facility could expose persons within a 100 kilometer radius from the plant to radiation 10 to 100 times the lethal level, which presumably means instant death.

      On April 7, just one month after the 3/11 earthquake in northeastern Japan, there was a large aftershock. At the Rokkasho Reprocessing Plant the electricity was shut off. The pool containing nuclear fuel and the radioactive liquid waste were (barely) cooled down by the emergency generators, meaning that Japan was brought to the brink of destruction. But the Japanese media, as usual, paid this almost no notice.

      Hirose Takashi has written a whole shelf full of books, mostly on the nuclear power industry and the military-industrial complex. Probably his best known book is Nuclear Power Plants for Tokyo in which he took the logic of the nuke promoters to its logical conclusion: if you are so sure that they’re safe, why not build them in the center of the city, instead of hundreds of miles away where you lose half the electricity in the wires?

      Douglas Lummis is a political scientist living in Okinawa and the author of Radical Democracy. Lummis can be reached at ideaspeddler@gmail.com

      Well-loved. Like or Dislike: Thumb up 5 Thumb down 0

  • Dwight Kondo

    DrT:

    Great!

    So your saying: We ain’t nowhere near out of the woods just yet and TEPCO got plenty of iron in the fire. And that iron is burning and so is the water too, from what I can tell.

    Will all the water in the Pacific Ocean be enough to cool down the heating in No 4 fuel rod storage tank?

    And what are we/they supposed to do if the water breaks down into its basic two elements, hydrogen and oxygen, and explodes like we seen three or four times already at Fukushima?

    Is there a cram-study book called, “How to Manage A Nuclear Catastrophe for Dummies”, or has it not been written yet?

    Will it ever be?

    Like or Dislike: Thumb up 3 Thumb down 2

Featured

Ashida’s Conflict of Interest

What has been unstated in the media until now is that Lincoln Ashida's campaign spending report shows that he accepted a $200 campaign contribution...
Read more »

Hawaiian Sovereignty: Clarifying the Record

This letter is in response to Dr. Ken Conklin’s article  printed in the Hawai`i Reporter online on September 1, 2011, as well as the...
Read more »

Ashida Plays Politics with County Council

By Curtis Narimatsu and Go Lakers Mayor Billy Kenoi’s veto of the County of Hawaii budget for 2011-2012 was made possible by Corporation Counsel Lincoln Ashida’s handy declaration...
Read more »

Mayor Kenoi’s “Public Relations” Staff Quiet on Kama’aina Pumping Scandal

A public/media relations professional is the opposite of a journalist, in that a public relations crisis entails damage control, not damage proliferation. And a...
Read more »

The Kama’aina Pumping Scandal Remains Scandalous

By Curtis Narimatsu and Pseudonym Golakers Kama’aina Pumping Service, owned by County of Hawaii Public Works Automotive Division Head, Randy Riley, was chosen by the...
Read more »

Switch to our mobile site